NPRA Says EPA E15 Gasoline Labels Are Inadequate

29 06 2011

WASHINGTON, DC – June 28, 2011 – (Motor Sports Newswire) – Charles T. Drevna, president of NPRA, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, today issued the following statement in response to the Environmental Protection Agency’s E15 misfueling rule:

“EPA’s decision to rely solely on retail gasoline pump labels to protect consumers from misfueling with gasoline containing 15 percent ethanol is woefully inadequate and compounds the fundamental mistakes EPA made in approving the sale of E15 in 2010. The rule is a terrible miscalculation and terrible news for millions of Americans who will inevitably face costly repair bills after misfueling their cars, trucks, motorcycles, boats, snowmobiles and outdoor power equipment with gasoline containing 15 percent ethanol.

“The last time EPA allowed two types of gasoline to be sold side-by-side at retail stations – when leaded gasoline was phased out in the 1970s – EPA’s own statistics reported that more than 20 percent of motorists mistakenly or intentionally misfueled their vehicles. This high rate of misfueling occurred despite the fact that EPA mandated physical barriers – fill pipe restrictors on vehicles and smaller nozzles on gasoline retail dispensers – in addition to pump labels. EPA’s apparent conclusion that pump labels alone will educate and warn consumers about the dangers of E15 misfueling flies in the face of EPA’s own experience and data and could be classified as arbitrary.

“NPRA members remain committed to consumer protection and to continuing to manufacture safe and reliable fuel for use by American families. This is why we asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia earlier this year to overturn EPA’s approval of the use of 15 percent ethanol in gasoline. And it is why NPRA and others will be reviewing the misfueling rule carefully to determine if EPA has unlawfully abdicated its consumer and environmental protection responsibilities under the Clean Air Act.”

SOURCE: National Petrochemical & Refiners Association

####





24 Groups Seek More Time to Comment on E15 Regulations

18 12 2010

WASHINGTON, December 16, 2010 – (Motor Sports Newswire) – A diverse group of 24 organizations today asked the Environmental Protection Agency to allow an additional 60 days for public comment on proposed regulations designed to prevent misfueling with gasoline containing 15 percent ethanol (E15).

NPRA, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, is among the signers of a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson requesting the extension beyond the current deadline of Jan. 3.

The letter says the extension is needed “to allow stakeholders the opportunity to offer complete and thoughtful comments” on the proposed misfueling regulations. Three of the eight weeks EPA designated to receive comments fall around holidays, when many people are out of their offices, the letter points out.

Organizations signing the letter are: Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers; American Boat Builders & Repairers Association; American Petroleum Institute; American Sportfishing Association; Association of Marina Industries; Boat Owners of the United States (BoatU.S.); Center for Coastal Conservation; Coastal Conservation Association; Engine Manufacturers Association; Environmental Working Group; International Liquid Terminals Association; International Snowmobile Manufacturers Association; Marine Retailers Association of America; Motorcycle Industry Council; National Association of State Boating Law Administrators; National Association of Truck Stop Operators (NATSO); National Marine Manufacturers Association; National Meat Association; National Petrochemical & Refiners Association; Outdoor Power Equipment Institute; Personal Watercraft Industry Association; Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council; Specialty Equipment Market Association; and Specialty Vehicle Institute of America.

“The members of NPRA want to be absolutely certain that the gasoline we manufacture for the American people is safe, effective and reliable,” said NPRA President Charles T. Drevna. “This is why we’ve repeatedly asked EPA to proceed carefully on all its decisions regarding increasing the amount of ethanol allowed in our nation’s fuel supply.”

“Misfueling is a serious problem that could cause costly damage to the engines in vehicles and equipment powered by gasoline,” Drevna said. “Groups concerned about this require more time to evaluate the problem so they can give EPA their best ideas on how to prevent misfueling.”

EPA approved the use of E15 on Oct. 13 for cars and light-duty trucks produced for the 2007 model year and later, but did not approve the use of E15 for older cars and light-duty trucks, or for any model year for motorcycles, heavy-duty trucks, buses, boats, snowmobiles and outdoor power equipment.

Misfueling occurs when someone puts the wrong gasoline into an engine. For example, the driver of an older car could fill up with E15, or someone could fill a can with E15 for use in a lawnmower. NPRA supports the use of gasoline containing 10 percent ethanol (E10), which already makes up 85 percent of the gasoline sold in America, but advocates more testing to determine if E15 is safe.

EPA’s proposed regulations designed to prevent misfueling include fuel pump labeling requirements to make consumers aware when a pump dispenses E15 and to educate them on the limited number of vehicles EPA says can use E15. In addition, EPA has proposed a quarterly survey of gasoline retailers designed to help ensure that gasoline pumps are properly labeled.

SOURCE: National Petrochemical & Refiners Association

####





NPRA Criticizes EPA Decision to Increase Ethanol in Gasoline Could Damage Motorcycles

15 10 2010

WASHINGTON, DC – October 13, 2010 – (Motor Sports Newswire) – Gregory M. Scott, executive vice president and general counsel of NPRA, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, issued the following statement criticizing the decision announced today by the Environmental Protection Agency to approve the sale of gasoline containing 15 percent ethanol (E15) for late-model cars, up from the current limit of 10 percent ethanol (E10):

“The Environmental Protection Agency today abdicated its responsibility to safeguard our nation’s public health and environment and became the Ethanol Promotion Agency. EPA’s unwise and premature decision to allow the sale of gasoline with higher levels of ethanol may be good politics in Corn Belt states on the eve of the midterm elections, but it is bad news for every American who owns a car, truck, motorcycle, boat, snowmobile, lawnmower, chainsaw or anything else powered by gasoline.

“The ethanol industry has won a victory today by convincing the federal agency charged with protecting our nation’s public health and environment to disregard public safety and environmental issues and instead base a major policy decision on inadequate engine test data that has not been made public or reviewed independently. The American people are the losers today because EPA has violated President Obama’s 2009 commitment to them to put science ahead of politics.

“EPA is asking the American people to pump first and ask questions later, and to become guinea pigs in a giant science experiment that involves their vehicles, their gasoline-powered equipment, and their safety. Instead of rushing to judgment to announce this decision today, EPA should have required the completion of thorough and objective scientific testing of increased ethanol in gasoline to protect millions of Americans.

“Our nation’s domestic petroleum refiners are committed to manufacturing safe, reliable and clean gasoline, and we will continue to oppose any EPA actions that could endanger the safety of the American families, farmers and truckers we serve every day. We take the confidence Americans place in our products – demonstrated by the millions of times each day that consumers purchase gasoline and diesel fuel – very seriously, and we will consider every option available to reverse EPA’s ill-considered and politically motivated decision.”

NPRA members include more than 450 companies, including virtually all U.S. refiners and petrochemical manufacturers. Our members supply consumers with a wide variety of products and services used daily in their homes and businesses. These products include gasoline, diesel fuel, home heating oil, jet fuel, lubricants and the chemicals that serve as “building blocks” in making everything from plastics to clothing to medicine to computers.

SOURCE: National Petrochemical & Refiners Association

####





36 Groups Ask Senate Leaders to Reject Increasing Ethanol in Gasoline

28 07 2010

WASHINGTON, DC – July 26, 2010 – (Motor Sports Newswire) – Thirty-six environmental and industry groups signed a letter that went to the majority and minority leaders of the Senate today urging opposition to any amendment to the upcoming energy bill that would authorize the sale of gasoline with more than 10 percent ethanol.

NPRA, the National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, was among the signatories.

Some in the ethanol industry are seeking approval in Congress of proposals to increase the amount of ethanol in gasoline by 50 percent – from the current 10 percent to 15 percent. The text of the letter is below:

July 26, 2010

The Honorable Harry Reid

Senate Majority Leader

United States Senate

Washington, D.C. 20510

The Honorable Mitch McConnell

Senate Minority Leader

United States Senate

Washington, D.C. 20510

Re: Opposition to Potential Amendment on Authorization of Mid-Level Ethanol Blends

Dear Senators Reid and McConnell:

The undersigned organizations urge you to oppose any amendment to the upcoming Senate energy bill that would authorize legislatively the introduction into commerce of ethanol blends higher than ten percent (so-called mid-level ethanol blends) for use in conventional gasoline-powered engines. Such an amendment would short-circuit existing two-year joint Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Energy and industry research projects designed to insure that mid-level ethanol blends do not harm gasoline-powered engines, defeat emissions control devices, pose safety risks to consumers, or increase emissions from these engines.

Sound science, environmental protection and consumer safety – not politics – must guide this important decision. Section 211(f) of the Clean Air Act mandates a detailed scientific review before new fuels, additives, or fuel blends are introduced into commerce. EPA is in the midst of carrying out this review, including soliciting public comment from all stakeholders on the introduction of mid-level ethanol blends. This review must be allowed to continue and must not be pre-empted by Congress.

We collectively urge you to reject any attempt to attach a mid-level ethanol authorization amendment during the Senate’s consideration of energy legislation in the coming weeks and months. Such an amendment would be bad for consumers, bad for safety, bad for the environment, and, by placing politics over sound science, bad public policy.

Sincerely yours,

American Frozen Food Institute (AFFI)
American Lung Association
American Meat Institute (AMI)
American Petroleum Institute (API)
American Sportfishing Association (ASA)
American Watercraft Association (AWA)
Association of International Automobile Manufacturers (AIAM)
Association of Marina Industries
Bass Anglers Sportsmen Society/ESPN Outdoors
Boat Owners Association of the United States (BoatU.S.)
Center for Coastal Conservation
Clean Air Task Force
Coastal Conservation Association (CCA)
Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF)
Earthjustice
Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA)
Environmental Working Group
Friends of the Earth
Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA)
The Hispanic Institute
Motorcycle Industry Council (MIC)
National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS)
National Association of State Boating Law Administrators (NASBLA)
National Boating Federation (NBF)
National Council of Chain Restaurants (NCCR)
National Marine Manufacturers Association (NMMA)
National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA)
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
Outdoor Power Equipment Institute (OPEI)
Personal Watercraft Industry Association (PWIA)
Sierra Club
Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (SBE Council)
Snack Food Association (SFA)
Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of America (SIGMA)
Specialty Vehicle Institute of America (SVIA)
The Petroleum Marketers Association of America (PMAA)
cc: Members of the United States Senate

SOURCE: National Petrochemical & Refiners Association

####





Groups Opposing Increase in Ethanol in Gasoline Launch Campaign Advocating More Scientific Testing

22 07 2010

Warn of Possible Safety and Environmental Dangers

WASHINGTON – July 21, 2010 – (Motor Sports Newswire) – Environmental and industry groups that frequently oppose each other on a broad range of policy issues are launching a joint campaign calling on Congress to require thorough and objective scientific testing before allowing an increase in the amount of ethanol in gasoline.

Raising strong concerns about consumer safety and environmental protection, the groups have joined forces to sponsor an ad with the tagline “Say NO to untested E15″ as part of an effort to persuade Congress and the Environmental Protection Agency to reject calls by some in the ethanol industry to allow the amount of ethanol in gasoline to increase by 50 percent.

Most gasoline sold in the United States contains 10 percent ethanol (E10).  Some ethanol lobbyists are seeking to boost that to 15 percent (E15), or to compromise with a boost to 12 percent (E12).

The groups are contacting members of Congress and have posted their first ad and other material warning against higher levels of ethanol without adequate testing on the Web site www.FollowtheScience.org.

The first ad will begin running Thursday in Politico and Roll Call (print and Web) and continue in these publications and Congress Daily next week. More ads are expected to follow later.

Ethanol burns hotter than gasoline and corrodes soft metals, plastics and rubber. The groups collectively believe more testing is needed to determine how much ethanol is too much for different types of existing engines to use safely without risking engine failure that could leave a boat stranded at sea, a snowmobile stuck in subfreezing temperatures in a wilderness blizzard, or a motorcycle unable to move in the blazing heat of a desert.

“Some ethanol companies want consumers to pump first and ask questions later,” said National Petrochemical & Refiners Association President Charles T. Drevna. “Rather than run a giant science experiment on the vehicles and gasoline-powered equipment owned by just about every American family, we believe Congress and the EPA have a responsibility to protect the public. They shouldn’t authorize E15 unless full and complete scientific testing confirms it’s safe and compatible with all gasoline-powered engines.”

The sponsors of the ad are: Environmental Working Group; Natural Resources Defense Council; The Hispanic Institute; Engine Manufacturers Association; International Snowmobile Manufacturers Association; Motorcycle Industry Council; National Marine Manufacturers Association; Outdoor Power Equipment Institute; American Frozen Food Institute; American Meat Institute; Grocery Manufacturers Association; Snack Food Association; American Petroleum Institute; National Association of Truck Stop Operators; National Petrochemical & Refiners Association.

The ad is illustrated by four color photos of people next to stalled vehicles and equipment – a snowmobile, a car, a riding lawnmower and a boat – under the headline: “Don’t let the ethanol industry leave you stranded.”

“Congress shouldn’t rush to judgment based on politics,” the ad says. “It should wait for the completion of thorough and objective scientific tests and act to protect your safety and our environment.

“Increasing hot-burning ethanol from 10% (E10) to 15% (E15) of gasoline could harm some engines,” the ad continues. “E15 has never been thoroughly tested to determine if it’s safe for engines in the cars, boats and outdoor power equipment used by millions of Americans every day.”

The groups also raise other concerns about increasing ethanol in gasoline.

“As environmentalists and public health advocates, we’re concerned that more corn ethanol in our gasoline would lead to more dangerous pollutants coming out our tailpipes and ending up in our lungs, cause more forests to be cut down for planting, put fragile lands under the tractor and use up scarce water resources,” said Nathanael Greene, director of renewable energy policy for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

“None of the 200 million pieces of outdoor power equipment in use today were designed, built or warranted to run on any fuel containing more than 10 percent ethanol,” said Kris Kiser, executive vice president of the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute.  “DOE testing of E-15 on existing outdoor power equipment demonstrated increased heat, performance irregularities, unintentional clutch engagement and failure.  It is imperative that all testing is complete on E-15 before its introduction into the fuels marketplace to protect consumers’ safety and economic interests.”

The Department of Energy (DOE) is currently conducting limited testing of the ability of pollution control equipment in some cars to function with E15, and EPA may make a decision allowing E15 in late-model cars in September.

However, the DOE tests do not cover critical areas including: engine durability; tolerance of the “check-engine” light; durability of other components, such as the fuel pump and the fuel level sensor; and the problem of fuel vapors leaking out of an idle car – parked with the engine off – sitting outside on a hot sunny day.

Extensive testing in all of these areas where DOE is not conducting its own testing is well underway – with the knowledge of both EPA and DOE – by the privately funded Coordinating Research Council. However, those extensive scientific tests will not be completed for several years.

SOURCE: FollowtheScience.org

####








%d bloggers like this: